It is suggested that the “post-70s” and “post-80s” in the family planning era should be paid special compensation for pensions

in the family planning era should be paid special compensation for pensions

With the intensification of China’s population aging and the historical impact of the family planning policy, the pension security system is facing unprecedented challenges. Recently, some experts have put forward pension compensation suggestions for specific age groups, which has attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. These suggestions mainly target the “post-70s” and “post-80s” generations in the family planning era, as well as pension subsidies for the “post-90s” population with many children. This article aims to explore the background, significance and possible implications of this proposal.

background analysis

Since China began to implement the family planning policy in 1979, this policy has had a profound impact on China’s social and economic development. On the one hand, family planning has effectively controlled population growth and provided strong support for China’s economic development and social stability. On the other hand, over time, this policy has also led to major changes in the population structure, especially the decline in the proportion of the labor force and the increase in the proportion of the elderly population, which has put great pressure on the pension security system.

The “post-70s” and “post-80s” are the main affected groups in the early stages of the implementation of the family planning policy. Most of them are only children and face the pressure of a “421” family structure, that is, a couple needs to take care of four elderly people and at the same time raise their own children. The “post-90s generation” is in a period of policy adjustment, especially with the opening of the two-child policy. The pension responsibilities and choices they face are different from before.

The meaning of expert advice

Against the above background, the pension “special compensation” and subsidy suggestions put forward by experts are of great significance:

  1. Alleviating pension pressure : By providing pension compensation for the “post-70s” and “post-80s”, the pension pressure they face can be alleviated to a certain extent, especially for those families with one child, this measure can provide additional financial support support.
  2. Encourage childbearing : Pension subsidies for those born in the 1990s with many children aim to encourage young people to have children through economic incentives, which has a positive effect on improving the population structure and increasing the proportion of the labor force.
  3. Equity considerations : These recommendations also reflect equity considerations for different groups affected by historical policies. By compensating groups that are greatly affected by the family planning policy, it reflects society’s recognition of their responsibilities and contributions.

possible challenges

Although the experts’ recommendations have positive implications, they may also face a series of challenges during implementation:

  1. Funding sources : Additional pension compensation and subsidies require huge financial support. How to ensure the continuous and stable supply of funds is the primary issue that needs to be resolved when implementing this policy.
  2. Policy design : How to design a fair and efficient pension compensation and subsidy mechanism to ensure that funds can accurately benefit target groups and avoid waste and abuse of resources is another important challenge.
  3. Long-term impact : In addition, it is also necessary to consider the long-term impact that this policy may have on social demographic structure, family structure, and the pension security system itself to ensure that it is in line with the overall strategy of national population development.
The “special compensation” for pensions for the “post-70s” and “post-80s” in the family planning era and the pension subsidies for the “post-90s” population with many children are complex and sensitive issues. The putting forward of these suggestions reflects society’s concern for elderly care issues and its pursuit of fairness and justice. When implementing these policies, multiple factors such as funding, policy design, and long-term impact must be comprehensively considered to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the policy. Only in this way can we truly improve the pension security system and provide stable and fair pension security for people of all ages.